Welcome

The ultimate source for opinions on all things related to the beautiful game in Serbia!

August 12, 2010

The Antic Saga

Serbia's 0-1 home defeat to Greece at Partizan Stadium on August 11 - which featured much of the same finishing problems from which the team suffered during the 2010 World Cup - has been completely overshadowed by the saga surrounding the team's head coach. According to statements made by Serbian FA leadership on August 12, Radomir Antic will be replaced as national team boss by next week. The FSS Technical Committee will most likely forward such a recommendation to the FA's Emergency Committee in the coming days.

While there are moderate voices and those who support Antic within the FA, it is clear that the majority of the FSS leadership would like to see the coach sacked. Their official reasoning is that Antic's suspension for four official matches - issued by FIFA as punishment for "Mister's" cursing of the referee during the Serbia v. Australia game at the 2010 World Cup - represents a gigantic barrier to Serbia's chances of qualification for Euro 2012. Adding fuel to the fire is Antic's refusal to take responsibility for the failure to advance past the group stage in South Africa, despite having at his disposal the best crop of Serbian players since the 1990s.

But the official reasoning never tells the full story, and when that is the case, the cause is usually money. The FSS would like Antic to accept a scaling back of his projected pay of €100,000 per month, agreed prior to the start of the World Cup. As expected, "Mister" does not want to do this, and insists that he is leading the national team down the right path. He cites improved support among the Serbian population, increased attendance at games, strong team morale, higher FIFA World Ranking and qualification for the World Cup itself as the successes that make him the right man for the job.

Of course, Antic is not without his own share of stubbornness. He blamed Serbia's failure to advance to the second round in South Africa on "poor luck" despite some suspect tactical and substitution decisions (especially in the game against Ghana). And with his player selection and tactics for the friendly against Greece, he signaled an intent to continue to use the outdated 4-4-2 formation with a largely unchanged line-up. This came despite Serbia's clear problems at the goalkeeper and striker positions, and despite the availability of younger and better-conditioned alternatives to some of the players who continue to be selected.

The positives of keeping Antic on the job are clear. Other than Bora Milutinovic - whose opportunity to coach Serbia has probably passed - the former Real Madrid, Barcelona and Atletico Madrid boss is by far the best Serbian-born coach the team can muster. He has a classy image and commands respect among the players. His tactical knowledge cannot be disputed, despite the questionable decisions during the game against Ghana. And who knows how much more Antic has made of less with the Serbian team, considering that a similar crop of players was losing left, right and center under Javier Clemente and Miroslav Djukic? These factors may only become clear when "Mister" is long-gone.

On the opposite side, Antic is by no means perfect. His player selection is stubborn, despite the average age of the Serbian team being just 26. Why are players who are older, physically inferior and/or not playing for their clubs (Stojkovic, Petrovic, Milijas, Pantelic, Zigic) still getting a chance ahead of other available talent (Jorgacevic, Matic, Ljajic, Sulejmani, Lekic)? And how did a coach of Antic's stature allow himself to curse at a referee in the game against Australia, knowing the consequences such a move could have? Forces within the FSS who have been against Antic all along were waiting for any viable excuse to sack him, and these actions - combined with "Mister's" refusal to take any responsibility for the results in South Africa - have given them the opportunity to do just that.

Of course, Soccer Serbia is always keeping up-to-date with the latest trends and opinions on Serbian soccer from all sources. Let's take a look at the projected levels of support for Antic among various key groups:
  • FSS Administration: largely against Antic
  • National team players: largely pro-Antic
  • Outside influential figures: split almost evenly between the two
  • Serbian media: split almost evenly between the two
  • Domestic fans (in Serbia): overwhelmingly pro-Antic
  • Diaspora fans: largely pro-Antic, but more overtly critical
Let's also take a look at some of the names being thrown out by the Serbian media as possible successors to Antic as national team coach:
  • Lothar Matthaus (co-top candidate)
  • Milovan Rajevac (unlikely)
  • Ilija Petkovic (possible)
  • Ljupko Petrovic (possible)
  • Slavoljub Muslin (possible)
  • Slavisa Jokanovic (co-top candidate)
  • Sinisa Mihajlovic (unlikely)

Weighing the noted factors, Soccer Serbia's analysis of this situation is that Radomir Antic should remain the head coach of the Serbian national team. Antic is the best domestic-born coach Serbia has. If he believes that the current players and tactics are sufficient to qualify for Euro 2012, there is no reason to doubt him. As many Serbian fans have pointed out, Antic cannot lace up the boots and put the ball in the net for the Serbian strikers; the final moment of concentration is up to them. Success for Antic would be measured by qualification for Euro 2012 and advancement past the group stage at the tournament. Of course, if Serbia fails to qualify or is disgraced at the tournament, Antic should resign. But we are nowhere near that situation yet, and a negative atmosphere can still be averted if the FSS allow Antic to perform his duties (from the stands, if need be).

On the other hand, the future of the FSS administration should be based on achieving concrete results in one of three areas by August 2012: domestic infrastructure, club football and national team (all levels). If no visible result occurs in at least one of these areas by the noted date, the FSS administration should resign. Examples of "concrete results" would include confirmation of the building of the proposed "Stadium Serbia"; a new law on club ownership; confirmed rennovation of the Red Star and Partizan stadiums, as well as other stadiums across the country; concrete advancement with regional partners and UEFA on the formation of a Balkan league; placement of at least one Serbian team in the Champions League group stage and/or Europa League quarterfinals, thus improving Serbia's UEFA coefficient; and qualification for Euro 2012, or a good result (semi-final or better) at a major championship by a youth category national team.

The stage is set. It's up to the characters to do their part. Stay with Soccer Serbia for the latest in-depth analyses of this and other unfolding stories!

August 6, 2010

It Starts from the Ground Up

This evening in Europe, three Serbian clubs had the opportunity to advance in the Europa League and in typical fashion, all three clubs failed to do so. In the case of OFK Beograd and Spartak Zlatibor Subotica, these are relatively smaller sides facing off against stronger opposition. OFK hosted Turkish giants Galatasaray and lost at home 1:5 after drawing in Istanbul 2:2 last week. Spartak traveled to the Ukraine and lost 2:0 to Dnipro D'petrovsk after winning the first leg 2:1 in Subotica.

While the fact that both clubs would have greatly benefited from a further appearance in the tournament, the biggest disappointment comes from Red Star Belgrade, who yet again fails to progress far in a European Competition.

Their weak peformance this year started with a home loss against Slovan Bratislava 1:2 then only managing to muster a 1:1 draw in the Slovak capital. With that, it has now been three years since the "massive" club from Belgrade made a group-stage appearance in either of the two European competitions.

Outside of Russia, Ukraine and if you want to include Turkey, none of the other Eastern European clubs have had much success in Europe. Recently, Levski Sofia and Steaua Bucharest reached the group stage of the Champions League and both had gone far in the Europa League, but other than those two clubs, the list of other success stories is non-existent. This isn't really a discussion on the entire region but more a focus on the Serbian clubs participating in Europe.

The fact that outside of Partizan Belgrade, no club is making a dent in Europe hurts both our domestic league and any real hopes of our national side doing well, both at senior and junior levels.

In order for our Senior national team to see any sort of success, we need our players to play in more important matches. There are only a handful of meaningful domestic matches each season so any real experience these players get is when participating in either competition. Yes, we have plenty of familar names playing on bigger clubs around Europe, unfortunately, these players never develop those talents domestically.

For our league to improve, these squads need to get better in Europe. In order for these clubs to reach Europe, our domestic league needs to improve. Yes, it's a Catch-22 but working on either will improve the other.

Where do the problems start? Is it the lack of proper private ownership with all clubs? Do we require a Balkan League in order to improve the quality on the pitch? Do we need the FSS to inject money into the smaller clubs? Do we need to restructure our Premier League to ensure that bigger cities like Kragujevac and Nis have teams instead of having 6 of the league's 16 clubs playing in the Capital? There are a lot of questions and unfortunately there is no correct answer because all threse options (and others) would do a lot to help.

Money is another important part that will help and it is these European Matches that bring in the most money. Most domestic matches only get about 2-4,000 fans but European matches almost always fill out stadiums. When Partizan fills up their 30,000 seat stadium and when Red Star can get the same or more fans into Marakana, then that's money in their pocket. The more games, the more money. Just imagine how much revenue a club like OFK gets when 15,000 fans fill up their stadium in Karaburma.

If FK Partizan, our only remaining Club playing in Europe can have a successful campaign, then it could help others indirectly. First off, it would improve our quickly dropping UEFA Coefficient, thus allowing us to be drawn against "weaker" clubs and secondly, it would put more pressure on the other clubs within Serbia to play well.

Partizan are by far the strongest and best club in Serbia and should yet again walk away with the League Trophy. The club is showing that it is serious in being a threat both domestically and continentally, so maybe it could be the start of something more. Hopefully, the further Partizan goes, the more it will push the other clubs, and more specifically, Red Star, to play harder and to do just as well.

There are a lot of "if" questions regarding Partizan in Europe and it will be a few weeks before we start seeing answers. It would be incredible if Partizan reach the Champions League group stage, but even if they don't they are still going to partake in the Europa League group stage. We will definitely follow their progress and hopefully other clubs will take notice.